Mid-Western U.S. Heavy Summer-Precipitation in Regional and Global Climate Models: The Impact on Model Skill and Consensus Through an Analogue Lens

Joint Program Report
Mid-Western U.S. Heavy Summer-Precipitation in Regional and Global Climate Models: The Impact on Model Skill and Consensus Through an Analogue Lens
Gao, X. and C.A. Schlosser (2017)
Joint Program Report Series, 14 p., October

Report 322 [Download]

Abstract/Summary:

Extreme precipitation events pose a significant threat to public safety, natural and managed resources, and the functioning of society. Changes in such high-impact, low-probability events have profound implications for decision-making, preparation and costs of mitigation and adaptation efforts. Understanding how extreme precipitation events will change in the future and enabling consistent and robust projections is therefore important for the public and policymakers as we prepare for consequences of climate change.

Projection of extreme precipitation events, however, particularly at the local scale, presents a critical challenge: the climate model-based simulations of precipitation that we currently rely on for such projections—general circulation models (GCMs)—are not very realistic, mainly due to the models’ coarse spatial resolution. This coarse resolution precludes adequate representation of highly influential, small-scale features such as moisture convection and topography. Regional circulation models (RCMs) provide much higher resolution and better representation of such features, and are thus often perceived as an optimum approach to producing more accurate heavy precipitation statistics than GCMs. However, they are much more computationally intensive, time-consuming and expensive to run.

In a previous paper, the researchers developed an algorithm that detects the occurrence of heavy precipitation events based on climate models’ well-resolved, large-scale atmospheric circulation conditions associated with those events—rather than relying on these models’ simulated precipitation. The algorithm’s results corresponded with observations with much greater precision than the model-simulated precipitation.

In this paper, the researchers show that using output from RCMs rather than GCMs for the new algorithm does not improve the precision of simulated extreme precipitation frequency. The algorithm thus presents a robust and economic way to assess extreme precipitation frequency across a broad range of GCMs and multiple climate change scenarios with minimal computational requirements.   

 

Citation:

Gao, X. and C.A. Schlosser (2017): Mid-Western U.S. Heavy Summer-Precipitation in Regional and Global Climate Models: The Impact on Model Skill and Consensus Through an Analogue Lens. Joint Program Report Series Report 322, 14 p., October (http://globalchange.mit.edu/publication/16781)
  • Joint Program Report
Mid-Western U.S. Heavy Summer-Precipitation in Regional and Global Climate Models: The Impact on Model Skill and Consensus Through an Analogue Lens

Gao, X. and C.A. Schlosser

Report 

322
14 p., October
2017

Abstract/Summary: 

Extreme precipitation events pose a significant threat to public safety, natural and managed resources, and the functioning of society. Changes in such high-impact, low-probability events have profound implications for decision-making, preparation and costs of mitigation and adaptation efforts. Understanding how extreme precipitation events will change in the future and enabling consistent and robust projections is therefore important for the public and policymakers as we prepare for consequences of climate change.

Projection of extreme precipitation events, however, particularly at the local scale, presents a critical challenge: the climate model-based simulations of precipitation that we currently rely on for such projections—general circulation models (GCMs)—are not very realistic, mainly due to the models’ coarse spatial resolution. This coarse resolution precludes adequate representation of highly influential, small-scale features such as moisture convection and topography. Regional circulation models (RCMs) provide much higher resolution and better representation of such features, and are thus often perceived as an optimum approach to producing more accurate heavy precipitation statistics than GCMs. However, they are much more computationally intensive, time-consuming and expensive to run.

In a previous paper, the researchers developed an algorithm that detects the occurrence of heavy precipitation events based on climate models’ well-resolved, large-scale atmospheric circulation conditions associated with those events—rather than relying on these models’ simulated precipitation. The algorithm’s results corresponded with observations with much greater precision than the model-simulated precipitation.

In this paper, the researchers show that using output from RCMs rather than GCMs for the new algorithm does not improve the precision of simulated extreme precipitation frequency. The algorithm thus presents a robust and economic way to assess extreme precipitation frequency across a broad range of GCMs and multiple climate change scenarios with minimal computational requirements.   

 

Posted to public: 

Tuesday, October 10, 2017 - 12:30